On second thought, women do not suffer from this delusion...they rather enjoy exercising it and as a result make their men suffer.
Monday, November 1, 2010
Common Delusions
On second thought, women do not suffer from this delusion...they rather enjoy exercising it and as a result make their men suffer.
Friday, July 2, 2010
Ice Queen
Sunday, June 13, 2010
Potentiality knocks on the door of my heart.
Thursday, June 3, 2010
Just too busy being fabulous...
Saturday, May 22, 2010
Healthy Looking
Monday, May 17, 2010
"What Happened to All the Nice Guys?"
Yes Indeed...WTF happened to them?
Wednesday, May 12, 2010
A little bit of both...
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
That Damn Smile (Did he just say that?)
Sunday, March 14, 2010
A picture's worth
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
These things have never happened
Friday, March 5, 2010
Great Expectations
There is no humanly comprehensible absolute truth out there, only differing viewpoints and theories.
George Carlin had his take and Scott Adams has his own.
No matter how tongue-in-cheek or scientifically grounded something is it can never be the entire truth, but only a simplified model of reality.
So here we go again...From Scott Adams.
"Women believe that men are, in a sense, defective versions of women; Men believe that women are defective versions of men.
(Although I don’t believe that either is defective)
Both genders are trapped in a delusion that their personal viewpoints are universal.
That viewpoint—that each gender is a defective version of the other—is the root of all misunderstandings.
Women define themselves by their relationships and men define themselves by whom they are helping.
Women believe value is created by sacrifice. If you are willing to give up your favorite activities to be with her, she will trust you.
If being with her is too easy for you, she will not trust you. You can accomplish your sacrifices symbolically at first, by leaving work early to buy flowers, canceling your softball game to make a date, that sort of thing.
Why does it seem like the rich and famous guys get all the women?
It is partly because the rich and famous are capable of making larger sacrifices. The average man might be sacrificing a night of television to be with a woman. The rich and famous man could be sacrificing a week in Tahiti. There is much to be said about the attraction of power and confidence exuded by a rich and powerful man, but capacity for sacrifice is the most important thing.
(I may not be rich or famous but Oh! I’ve sacrificed a lot- a lot of time and effort ...even money! More that I’d ever admit. But it was only because I believed she was worth every bit of it.
I’d be ashamed if I did it for myself,if I had selfish reasons, but honestly I did it for her.)
Men believe value is created by accomplishment, and they have objectives for the women in their lives. If a woman meets the objectives, he assumes she loves him. If she fails to meet the objectives, he will assume she does not love him. The man assumes that if the woman loved him she would have tried harder and he always believes his objectives for her are reasonable.
What objectives?
The objectives are different for each man. Men rarely share these objectives because doing so is a recipe for disaster.
(Elsewhere in my blog I have used the term expectations instead of objectives. They both mean the same in the given context.
Unfulfilled or broken expectations (objectives), in my opinion, cause most of the heartbreaks. I may have been guilty of thinking that my expectations could be easily met by her, because others have met it often without much effort and often without my wanting or asking)
No woman would tolerate being given a set of goals.
(I know that because I've tried that. Never give a woman a list of things that you expect from her.She'll find it demeaning.
Scott Adams tells you that women wouldn't tolerate it.
Of course that's true...Once you have told her…then...It is the loss of innocence…it is finally facing the naked truth …that things could have been better…but once acknowledged the knowledge hangs prominently like an ugly stain –an ugly stain of truth…which we all had pretended that it did not exist in the first place. There is a saying in Sanskrit which goes “Say the truth, or say what is sweet to hear. Do not say the truth that is bitter to swallow.”)
So what should a guy do if the woman in his life doesn’t meet these secret objectives? How can he get her to change?
He can’t.(Deep resounding evil maniacal laughter)
People don’t change to meet the objectives of other people. Men can be molded in small ways—clothing and haircuts and manners—because those things are not important to most men. Women can’t be changed at all!
(Is Scott Adams implying that women value their individuality more than men? BUT I'm so glad to know that! It means that I don't have to wait anymore; because I know people are incapable of change .
Not just women, even Men cannot be changed where it matters to them.Try to make a chain smoker quit smoking and you’ll know)
The best you can hope for in a relationship is to find someone whose flaws are the sort you don’t mind. It is futile to look for someone who has no flaws, or someone who is capable of significant change; that sort of person exists only in our imaginations!
(At the end of the day, I’d choose someone with whom I can comfortably talk to for hours than a beautiful yet dumb bimbo who'd make me yawn after five minutes. in it for the long term.After years, beauty may fade, but the comfort factor can only increase between two people. I want to get old comfortably but not bored.)
Kenton Knepper, a world famous mentalist writes "There is a main difference between the way men and women face life: Men choose, but women decide.
Men concentrate on options. Women focus on the act of actually deciding. Since the role of men in society has been primarily the same, the role of a provider, men tend to walk straight paths, even when there is doubt or failure. Women face now the possibility of becoming providers and by doing so they usually reject their traditional role as mothers and supporters of men.
When men choose, they are choosing between one option and the other one, in a forward motion. Women always have the feeling of being forced to decide a completely different path in each choice, not options on the path. This generates a lot of tension and worry. Contemporary women are often wondering if the grass is greener on the other side of the fence. Different from men, that "other side of the fence" is not another job or venture, but an entirely different way of life.
Women also tend to feel that they give too much and that their partners do not always reciprocate their investment. This is especially true in matters of communication and emotion.
And back to Scott Adams…
A woman needs to be told that you would sacrifice anything for her. A man needs to be told he is being useful.
(It’s true…the worst you can make any man feel is to make him feel inconsequential.I remember a scene from the movie Young Victoria, where Prince Albert makes an earnest confession when he says “I wish to be of use to you”.
That is how men show they love you…by being useful to you. Young Queen Victoria replies that she understands ,but not yet. Here they are candid about it and understand each other)
When the man or woman strays from that formula, the other loses trust. When trust is lost, communication falls apart.
Without trust, you can communicate only trivial things. If you try to communicate something important without a foundation of trust, you will be suspected of having a secret agenda. Your words will be analyzed for hidden meaning and your simple message will be clouded by suspicions.
How can I be more trusted?
You should lie about your talents and accomplishments, describing your victories in dismissive terms as if they were the result of luck. And you should exaggerate your flaws.
(I believe that being able to lie to a certain extent is necessary for a good relationship, especially if it is about not hurting them with insensitive honesty….No honey, you look fabulous in that dress, Of course , you can repair that engine all by yourself, No son…you are not a weirdo)
Isn't’t it better to be honest?
Honesty is like food. Both are necessary, but too much of either creates discomfort. When you downplay your accomplishments, you make people feel better about their own accomplishments. It is dishonest, but it is kind.
(My friend does that. He is incredibly talented and has accomplished a lot when you compare him to the rest of his peers. Yet no one is ever jealous of him. In all my years, I would be at awe at his towering intellect and genius, but never even once was jealous of him. He never allowed it to happen! He would constantly attribute his successes to luck than his efforts. He is kind and considerate in that way that he doesn’t rub his success in our collective faces. In many ways, I'm proud to have him as my friend and value his opinions.)
What about small talk?
You think casual conversation is a waste of time. Your problem is that you view conversation as a way to exchange information.
Conversation is more than the sum of the words. It is also a way of signaling the importance of another person by showing your willingness to give that person your rarest resource: time. It is a way of conveying respect. Conversation reminds us that we are part of a greater whole, connected in some way that transcends duty or bloodline or commerce.
Conversation can be many things, but it can never be useless.
(I always remember what Raknax wrote. He nailed it on the head when he wrote “Conversation is the King”. I remember that reading it made me think that I should have friends like him.)
A few other ingredients for successful social living:
Express gratitude. (Check)
Give more than is expected
(I always give more than I receive. Why? Volume! Volume! Volume! )
Speak optimistically (check).
Touch people (ok, this will be hard. I’m a little touchy on that issue).
Remember names (check).
Don’t confuse flexibility with weakness
(This ones hard.When does flexibility become weakness? Is bending backwards a sign of flexibility or a weak spine?).
Don’t judge people by their mistakes; rather, judge them by how they respond to their mistakes (Ok, I’ll wait and watch).
Remember that your physical appearance is for the benefit of others (check).
Attend to your own basic needs first; otherwise you will not be useful to anyone else. (Check)
-heavily paraphrased from Scott Adams’ ‘God’s Debris’.
(Finally I’d like to add that I don’t want anyone to be compelled to fall in love with me, just because I love her.
It doesn’t matter whether I’ve loved you for 7 years or seventy.
If you don’t love me, IT’S OK.
It was just something that was not meant to be.
Who knows…maybe by not falling in love with me, you might have done me a favour.
I don’t want anyone to fall in love with me because I’ve blackmailed her…or because she’s the only one I’ve ever loved. Love is sometimes a one-way street.)
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
Men Teach Women to Pickup Men!
Category: WTF were you thinking?
Thursday, February 25, 2010
Carlinspeak
Tuesday, May 12, 2009
Intelligent women have better sex...or Why you should date a Geek Chick
Bad luck bimbos: Intelligent women have better sex, study reveals...Or why you should date a geek!
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
Shall We Dance?
Some stories have to be told many a times to others before you finally tell them to yourselves.
This is one of those.
Male bonding is funny..We guys do some really girly stuff when we think no one is watching.
In one ship,my friend and I used to bond in ways we wouldn't acknowledge publicly.
Yes I'm ashamed to admit it, but we watched Rom-coms and chick flicks together.
(They are easy on the brain and it doesn't matter if you follow the plot or storyline and as such are excellent at the end of a tiring day)
One of our favourite movies was 'Shall We Dance', starring Richard Gere and Jennifer Lo-Pants(Lopez) and the ever beautiful Susan Sarandon.(I'm not overlooking very memorable performances by Stanley Tucci and Bobby Cannavale, whose histrionics were more entertaining than that of the rest of the cast)
Much as I hate to admit it, it was my fantasy to actually go through the same experiences, to stumble and learn how to dance,and magically undergo a life altering transformation and become a Dancing God! (I'm stumbling a lot)
I'm told Men who dance well are considered sexy, desirable or gay.
Hey I'd like to be sexy and desirable and happy too ! (just not gay)
But there was a problem...my own past.
Once as a kid, I took dancing lessons...but just one class.
My body did not listen to me.I couldn't do a single step my instructor taught me.The longer I was in the class, the more ashamed I felt about myself .
Humiliated and Disgusted at myself, I quit, never to return.
Years later,when I took Public Speaking lessons ,one of my shortcomings that everyone pointed out was my stiff and mechanical body .My nickname was 'The Soldier !
Attention !
Stand Hut!
The solution offered by my teacher was ...yes you guessed right...Dance Lessons!
It was Nietzsche who said "What I am not,that for me is God and virtue'
I surround myself with friends who are better than me (yes you too!), for you have something in you that I admire and aspire to be.
Similarly I have a cousin who is gifted with the ability to dance...I'm fond of her,and admire her for what she could and I lacked.I used to listen to her talk about dancing and her love for the art with rapt attention.(I must confess;I couldn't understand much of what she said, but was endlessly fascinated)
In my mind, my biggest weakness was my inability to coordinate my body in a graceful manner.
So when I found that my friend had joined a dance class,I decided to join myself...after all misery loves company.(my friend professed to be equally bad at dancing)
But what if I was a miserable failure like before?
What if I disgusted myself once again?
What if I make a fool of myself?
"Fools rush in where angels fear to tread"
As always, I go by the following adage...and I wouldn't want to rush in like a fool without actually knowing what I was getting into.
Thanks to the internet, I found a few videos and tutorials that supposedly would aid me in some way.
Here is my favourite one...
and another...
Boy,Was I wrong!
Videos cannot substitute real live tutors and active feedback...also, the dancers in the video were too good and their natural ease and comfort made me depressed about my own lack of grace and coordination.
But guess what...I was not the same old boy anymore,I had changed.
We had joined for a crash course in salsa and jive.
The term crash course has omnious connotations but I had made up my mind to succeed where once I had failed.
In my research, I came to know that Salsa is a very popular dance form in Latin America, U.S and Europe. The word is the same as the salsa meaning sauce, metaphorically referring the music and dance being "saucy","Spicy" and "tasty".
Yumm!
There are different styles that developed in different regions: New York style salsa, Puerto Rican salsa, Cuban style, California style.(I seem to be learning the Manglorean Salsa with a healthy helping of fish curry )
Normally Salsa is a partner dance, danced in a handhold.In partner dancing, the two partners are labelled as the lead and the follow, or leader and follower. Traditionally, the male partner leads and the female partner follows.
Now read this carefully...A lead controls the way the dance will go. He decides which moves or figures will be danced, and how to move the follow. The follow does what the name implies, and follows the lead. For the lead and follow to interact with each other, a connection must be established.
One goal of partner dancing is to move in ways that one dancer alone cannot.
I took up dance to unlearn stiffness and rigidity and to learn the art of gracefulness.However grace seems to be innate or maybe it is inherited -an elusive quality embedded in the chromosomes-passed on from generation to generation onto select offspring by divine providence.
I say that because when I look at myself dance in the mirror, I see a boxer looking for a street fight, a MMA fighter getting ready for a sparring session, a bull charging in a china shop...I don't like to look when I dance.Period.
But here was the crucial difference.
Once upon a time, I had gone to learn a solo style of dance.The entire emphasis was on me and also the pressure to perform.
I hated it.
This time it was a partner dance.I genuinly felt I could learn more than just dancing from this endeavor.
A popular joke goes something like this...Dancing is a wonderful training for girls;its the first way to learn to guess what a man is going to do before he does it.
It's not entirely true...The partner that follows and the one that leads both have to possess an inner drive to follow the soul of the dance and rhythm.
It's true that the lead controls the way the dance will go. He decides which moves or figures will be danced, and how to move the follow. The follow does what the name implies, and follows the lead.
Beginning leads try to control 99% of the dance. Advanced leads try to control 51% of the dance. The follow styles her own moves as she likes within the parameters communicated by the lead.
Learning to lead or to follow forces upon you a sensitivity and receptivity to subtle signals.
I'm an ogre by all standards, lacking sensitivity but now I'm forced to gently lead my partner with pushes,pulls and gentle nudges.Dance teaches you the subtle art of non-verbal communication...to talk without words.
You learn to deal with diferent partners with different personalities:the stiff, the tender,the soft,the nervous,the light,the innocent and the unyielding.
I'm afraid to extend the metphor of dance to life,even though many claim that it is so.One word -"Feminists" and then two more words-"Political Correctness"make me queasy and uneasy.
If I say Dance is Life...that the world is a ballroom and we are the dancers...just as once Shakespeare did with the stage ,then the issue of man taking a lead and the female following might seem offensive and regressive and politically incorrect to many feminists and pseudo-feminists(I'm looking at you guys who act like broad minded feminists to impress women.You are truly snakes in the grass)
Dance is an art form,where the art should be highlighted above the artists.It is a form of expression and it should transcend gender politics.
(wikipedia tells me that promenade-style dancing has no lead or follow, and that homosexuals in various parts of the world dance in exclusive venues making the gender politics partly redundant)
It is true though...Some women don't like to be led.They simply cannot follow.Maybe they are not accustomed to it.So they march to the beat of their own drummer,much to everyones chagrin.
"If the leader cannot lead, or if the follower cannot follow, it no longer remains a dance;it becomes a wrestling match" says my teacher .
I agree.
Sometimes we fight when we dance.
It ain't pretty.
Sunday, April 19, 2009
No Irony
The taste
of you
still lingers
on my
thought tongue
- John O' Sullivan
With trembling hands
unsteady fingers
deleted
your number.
I'd never
cave in
to temptation
and fall.
I phoned
an old friend
by mistake
yesterday
I refused
to remove
her name
after she died
She did not
answer.
Friday, April 3, 2009
Opposites 'Don't' Attract
Do opposites really attract? A new study finds that when it comes to personality, people seek partners with their same qualities — but claim to want someone who is different.
The study, recently published in the journal Evolutionary Psychology, asked 760 members of an online dating site to answer questionnaires regarding their personality traits, as well as the traits they would want in an ideal long-term partner. They then were asked if they most wanted a partner that complemented them, or resembled them.
The answers showed a preference for someone with the same sort of personality; the traits, which included neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness, all had positive participant-to-partner correlations, ranging from .51 to .62.
These findings are supported by previous research. A study conducted by the University of Iowa in 2005, for example, stated that similarity in personality was more important than similarities in attitude, religion, and values in forming a happy marriage. Like-minded people validate each other's beliefs and views, and there tend to be fewer conflicts as a result.
But despite the personality correlations, the new study has found that 85.7 percent of participants claim to want someone who has their opposite traits.
"When asked about their preferences for a mate, people may partially draw upon lay theories of romantic attraction rather than their true desires for a mate," says Pieternel Dijkstra, a professor at the University of Groningen in the Netherlands and the study's lead researcher.
One popular theory is that opposites attract; another is that having a similar partner would be "boring." But Dijkstra says these theories often prove untenable in real life.
"Although many individuals occasionally feel attracted to 'opposites,' attractions between opposites often do not develop into serious intimate relationships and, when they do, these relationships often end prematurely," she said.
The study also found that in addition to looking for a similar partner, women wanted men who were conscientious, outgoing, and emotionally stable, all traits that indicate an investment in the relationship and in any potential children.
However, "there were no particular traits that men seemed to prefer more than women," according to Dijkstra . For both sexes, finding common ground is a top priority.
So remember...